North Korea’s Nuclear Shadow: Then and Now

Manoj Ambat, Editor in Chief, Strategic Vanguard
6 minutes ago
3 min read

As North Korea tested a thermonuclear weapon in 2017 and continued its rapid advances in missile technology, the world was forced to confront a long-standing enigma — a reclusive state that has turned into one of the most persistent security headaches for the international community. Today, even in 2025, the North Korean nuclear question remains unresolved.

From Collapse to Confrontation

The story of North Korea’s nuclear ambitions cannot be separated from its turbulent history.

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Pyongyang lost its most important benefactor. The country’s economy, deeply dependent on Soviet aid, collapsed into crisis.
Around the same time, founding leader Kim Il-sung passed away, leaving the reins to his son Kim Jong-il. North Korea then suffered its worst famine, while Kim’s “military-first” doctrine deepened its isolation.
With the economy mismanaged and near collapse, Pyongyang turned increasingly toward illicit networks to sustain itself. Nuclear know-how, facilitated by black-market deals and links with Pakistan, soon became central to its survival strategy.

When Kim Jong-un inherited power in 2011, he displayed greater ambition and unpredictability than his father. Under his rule, North Korea has relentlessly pursued nuclear and missile capabilities, culminating in the 2017 hydrogen bomb test — its largest and most provocative to date.

The North Korean Nuclear Timeline

North Korea’s nuclear story stretches back decades:

1960s: Pyongyang initiated “all-fortressization,” embedding militarization at the core of its state policy. With Soviet support, it developed the Yongbyon Nuclear Research Center. China and the USSR, however, both refused to provide nuclear weapons assistance.
1980s–1990s: North Korea developed uranium enrichment facilities and began weapons-related experiments. In 1985, it signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), but compliance issues soon emerged. By 1993, Pyongyang threatened to withdraw, sparking its first confrontation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
1994 Agreed Framework: The U.S. promised light-water reactors in exchange for denuclearization. The deal collapsed by 2002 amid mutual accusations of non-compliance.
2006–2009: North Korea conducted its first and second nuclear tests, officially confirming itself as a nuclear power. The Six-Party Talks (with the U.S., China, Russia, Japan, and South Korea) attempted to negotiate disarmament, but collapsed after repeated missile tests.
2012–2016: Pyongyang announced moratoriums but backtracked quickly, conducting long-range rocket launches and successive nuclear tests. Its fifth test in 2016 was estimated at up to 25 kilotons.
2017: The game-changing year. North Korea test-launched ICBMs capable of reaching the U.S. mainland and claimed a successful hydrogen bomb test.

Since then, North Korea has only expanded its nuclear capabilities while sanctions proved increasingly ineffective.

Why Sanctions Fail

North Korea has endured decades of sanctions yet continues to sustain its weapons programs.

Illicit economy: Pyongyang runs one of the most sophisticated black-market networks in the world.
Self-reliance: Years of embargoes have forced the country to develop a degree of economic immunity.
Strategic leverage: For Pyongyang, nuclear weapons are not just military assets but bargaining chips — ensuring regime survival and global attention.

What Options Does the World Have?

Dealing with North Korea remains one of the most complex strategic challenges:

Military action: Highly risky, given that any strike could escalate into a devastating regional war.
Diplomacy: Requires sustained engagement, but past negotiations show Pyongyang’s pattern of making promises only to backtrack.
Containment: Strengthening missile defense and deterrence, while limiting North Korea’s external networks.
Carrot and stick: Combining pressure with incentives for economic reform, though the regime’s survival instinct makes this uncertain.

The Road Ahead

More than three decades after its nuclear ambitions became public, North Korea has transformed into a de facto nuclear state. Its secrecy makes it unpredictable, and its resilience to sanctions makes it difficult to isolate.

The challenge for the international community is clear: preventing the Korean Peninsula from slipping into conflict while finding a sustainable way to contain or roll back Pyongyang’s nuclear capabilities. The stakes could not be higher — a war on the peninsula would have catastrophic global consequences.